ArticleHead and neck pathology2026
International Consensus Guidelines for Diagnostic Criteria and Checklist for Future Studies for Minimally Invasive Carcinoma ex Pleomorphic Adenoma: An HN CLEAR Initiative.
Article in Head and neck pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A variety of factors, including the extent of invasion, determine the clinical outcome in patients with carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma (Ca ex PA). A Head and Neck Consensus Language for Ease of Reproducibility (HN CLEAR) Steering Committee organized a working group (WG) to harmonize diagnostic and research approaches for assessing invasion in Ca ex PA.WG of head and neck pathologists and a radiation oncologist conducted 6 iterative rounds of online voting (Modified Delphi), using Google Forms, over an 8-month period on invasion in the setting of Ca ex PA. Agreement was defined by the same opinion of at least 50% of the responders. The list of parameters with predetermined options was developed.Minimally invasive Ca ex PA was defined as a pT1-2 pN0 carcinoma, resected en bloc with negative margins, with or without perineural invasion, without vascular invasion and without distant metastasis at presentation. Consensus was not reached on whether high grade histology is compatible with the concept of "minimal invasion". Diagnosis of minimal invasion is possible when tumor excision is complete (with negative margins), en bloc (without fragmentation), and requires sampling of the entire tumor capsule or tumor-normal interface. The consensus guidelines characterizing Ca ex PA and the list of challenging aspects are provided. The WG proposed a checklist for future research, aiming to refine the diagnosis of in situ and minimally invasive Ca ex PA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.