Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41848729›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

Preferences for Social Media Vaccination Messaging.

Lucía Abascal Miguel, Alison B Comfort, Alicia R Riley, Gilberto Lopez, Janelli Vallin, Anna E Epperson, Nadia Diamond-Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lucía Abascal MiguelInstitute for Global Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco.
Alison B ComfortDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco.
Alicia R RileyDepartment of Sociology, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz.
Gilberto LopezSchool of Transborder Studies, Arizona State University, Tempe.
Janelli VallinInstitute for Global Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco.
Anna E EppersonDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of California, Merced, Merced.
Nadia Diamond-SmithInstitute for Global Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Social media is a dominant source of health information, including vaccine information, but little is known about which message characteristics audiences prefer when deciding what social media content to engage with and about how to measure these preferences. Objective: To quantify the attributes of existing social media vaccination posts that are associated with the preference for and confidence in vaccination-related content. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used a combination of the discrete choice experiment (DCE) and the Swiss tournament approaches to evaluate preferences, which were collected in an online survey between March and May 2024. Participants (aged ≥18 years) from a previous California-based COVID-19 study were recontacted through social media between January and August 2024. Participants completed the DCE and Swiss tournament test. Exposures: Participants viewed pairs of vaccination-related social media posts that varied systematically by attributes, such as messenger, source, tone, artwork type, age group of messenger, and topic. Main Outcomes and Measures: Participants selected which post they were most likely to engage with (like, share, or comment). Preferences were analyzed using a conditional logit model to estimate relative importance of post attributes. Results: Among 243 participants (mean [SD] age, 36.4 [12.4] years; 127 males [52.5%]), 153 (63.0%) reported favorable attitudes toward vaccines in general, 167 (68.7%) toward influenza vaccines, and 117 (48.2%) toward COVID-19 vaccines. Daily social media use was common (228 [93.8%]), and most participants preferred visual content, such as pictures (206 [84.8%]) or short videos (184 [75.7%]). In the DCE, social media vaccination posts from public health agencies such as California Department of Public Health (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.80; 95% CI, 1.57-2.07) and University of California San Francisco (AOR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.21-2.29) and posts depicting health care workers (AOR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.12-1.47) or older adults (AOR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.22-1.80) were more likely to be preferred. Humorous tone was associated with reduced preference (AOR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.36-0.57), whereas COVID-19 (AOR, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.95-2.87) and influenza (AOR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.54-2.06) topics were associated with increased likelihood for preference. Artwork type showed no significant association with preference. Conclusions and Relevance: This cross-sectional study found that participants preferred social media-based vaccination posts that were factual, featured health care professionals, and were sourced from public health organizations. Understanding communication preferences through innovative experimental methods can inform the design of digital public health communications.

Indexed as

COVID-19Social MediaVaccinationAdultCaliforniaCOVID-19 VaccinesCross-Sectional StudiesDigital MediaFemaleHumansMaleMedia ExposureMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultCOVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID41848729
PMCPMC13000627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.