ArticleExperimental physiology2026
Respiratory and non-respiratory airflow characteristics across ingestive and non-ingestive swallowing tasks.
Article in Experimental physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Correlation between swallowing and diaphragmatic functions in stroke patients with hemiplegia: a cross-sectional observational study.Scientific reports · 2026Observational
- Respiratory and non-respiratory airflow characteristics across ingestive and non-ingestive swallowing tasks.Experimental physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Respiratory-swallowing coordination is critical for safe swallowing. Respiratory phase patterns, indicating the direction of respiration bracketing swallowing, appear minimally altered when oral airflow is measured alongside nasal airflow. Measures from an oronasal facemask also demonstrate broader features of swallowing non-respiratory flow (SNRF) associated with the respiratory-swallowing pause than previously reported. Additionally, nasal and oronasal flow estimates show variability in within-individual respiratory phase patterning. In this study, an oronasal facemask and separate nasal-only mask were used to assess healthy individuals, exploring how instrumentation influences respiratory phase pattern estimates across swallowing tasks. Characteristics of SNRF and variability of respiratory phase patterns were also investigated. Adding oral flow to nasal flow appeared to reduce estimated exhale-swallow-exhale patterning by 13% and increased the estimated frequency of alternative patterns, although this may include some genuine variance between the datasets due to asynchronous data acquisition from each mask. SNRF occurred in 87-97% of swallows, with inward and outward flow occurring at the onset and offset of the respiratory-swallowing pause. Test-retest reliability of respiratory phase patterns within individuals ranged from κ = 0.4 - 0.54, with ≥2 patterns observed across four trials >40% of the time. Findings suggest that adding oral to nasal flow alters estimates of respiratory phase patterns, particularly during ingestive swallowing tasks. SNRF is observed more frequently when measured through a closed system, presenting as inwardly- or outwardly-directed airflow at the beginning or end of the respiratory-swallowing pause. Finally, there appears to be considerable variability in respiratory phase patterning across trials of the same swallowing condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.