ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2026
Structural and evolutionary dissection of NADPH-binding motifs in NADPH-preferring ene-reductases.
Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Structural and evolutionary dissection of NADPH-binding motifs in NADPH-preferring ene-reductases.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ene-reductases (ERs) catalyze nicotinamide-dependent, stereoselective reductions of activated CC bonds. While their catalytic chemistry and applications are well-explored, cosubstrate (NAD(P)H) binding remains poorly understood. Most ERs strongly prefer NADPH despite lacking canonical dinucleotide-binding folds and instead employ flexible loop motifs. We recently elucidated the NADPH-binding mode of the NADPH-preferring ER Solanum lycopersicum OPR3 (SlOPR3), identifying four key residues (R283/R343/Y364/R366) that form two motifs: a 2'-phosphate (2'-P)-binding site (R343/Y364/R366) and a loop 6 (L6)-mediated adenine clamp (R283/R343). Guided by this model, we analyzed the conservation of these motifs across 51 NADPH-preferring ERs from different Old Yellow Enzyme (OYE) classes by multi-sequence alignment and homology modeling. Analyses revealed a class-dependent distribution: class-II ERs predominantly conserve the OPR3-like motifs, whereas other classes employ alternative mechanisms, including dimerization-induced modes. Functional dissection of SlOPR3 through mutagenesis, kinetics, and crystallography established a functional hierarchy of the motif elements, indicating that R343 and R366 are indispensable for NADPH binding in OPR3-like ERs, while the adenine clamp acts as a conformation-sensitive affinity tuner. Ancestral sequence reconstruction revealed the stepwise and convergent assembly of motif elements, culminating in the complete motif set in plant, fungal, and cyanobacterial lineages. Our findings delineate (i) a strict functional hierarchy of NADPH-binding residues in OPR3-like ERs, (ii) alternative binding solutions in other OYE classes, and (iii) a convergent evolutionary trajectory, advancing the fundamental understanding of NADPH binding in NADPH-preferring ERs and offering a modular framework to predict NADPH preference in ERs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.