ArticleInternal medicine journal2026
National survey of real-world treatment patterns for early- and intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma reveals wide variation across Australian states.
Article in Internal medicine journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a heterogeneous and multi-disease state that is complex to manage and requires a multidisciplinary approach to optimise patient care. Best practice recommendations were proposed in the Australian HCC consensus statement published in 2020.
aimThis study aimed to compare the patterns of care between Australian states for patients with very-early- to intermediate-stage HCC.
methodsMultidisciplinary specialists involved in HCC management (n = 86) participated in one of six state-based meetings across Australia. Specialists were surveyed on their preferred management approaches at key clinical decision points for four patient case studies of very early- to intermediate-stage HCC.
resultsAcross Australia, approaches to HCC surveillance and diagnosis were concordant between states and aligned with the Australian HCC consensus statement recommendations. However, there was wide deviation between states in HCC treatment and monitoring strategies, particularly in the choice of imaging modality for assessing response to therapy, choice of locoregional therapy and consideration and timing of systemic therapy. The main factors contributing to variance between states in patterns of care for patients with very-early- to intermediate-stage HCC included accessibility of technology, centre expertise, collaborations and access to and participation in clinical trials.
conclusionsIn Australia, there is wide variation between states in the patterns of care for patients with very-early- to intermediate-stage HCC. The variation in HCC patterns of care between states likely reflects the rapidly evolving HCC treatment landscape and differential access to new therapeutic modalities and local expertise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.