Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41848345›Full record

ArticleInternal medicine journal2026

National survey of real-world treatment patterns for early- and intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma reveals wide variation across Australian states.

Stuart K Roberts, Ammar Majeed, Kiran Rasaratnam, John K Olynyk, Nicholas Shackel, Marnie Wood, Alan Wigg, Simone I Strasser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Internal medicine journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Stuart K RobertsDepartment of Gastroenterology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9015-7997
Ammar MajeedDepartment of Gastroenterology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Kiran RasaratnamDepartment of Medicine, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
John K OlynykCurtin Medical Research Institute, Curtin University, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia.
Nicholas ShackelDepartment of Gastroenterology, Gastroenterology Services, Launceston, Tasmania, Australia.
Marnie WoodDepartment of Gastroenterology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3740-9443
Alan WiggCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Flinders, South Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8054-5745
Simone I StrasserAW Morrow Gastroenterology and Liver Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6374-1525

Funding

Astra Zeneca
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a heterogeneous and multi-disease state that is complex to manage and requires a multidisciplinary approach to optimise patient care. Best practice recommendations were proposed in the Australian HCC consensus statement published in 2020.

aimThis study aimed to compare the patterns of care between Australian states for patients with very-early- to intermediate-stage HCC.

methodsMultidisciplinary specialists involved in HCC management (n = 86) participated in one of six state-based meetings across Australia. Specialists were surveyed on their preferred management approaches at key clinical decision points for four patient case studies of very early- to intermediate-stage HCC.

resultsAcross Australia, approaches to HCC surveillance and diagnosis were concordant between states and aligned with the Australian HCC consensus statement recommendations. However, there was wide deviation between states in HCC treatment and monitoring strategies, particularly in the choice of imaging modality for assessing response to therapy, choice of locoregional therapy and consideration and timing of systemic therapy. The main factors contributing to variance between states in patterns of care for patients with very-early- to intermediate-stage HCC included accessibility of technology, centre expertise, collaborations and access to and participation in clinical trials.

conclusionsIn Australia, there is wide variation between states in the patterns of care for patients with very-early- to intermediate-stage HCC. The variation in HCC patterns of care between states likely reflects the rapidly evolving HCC treatment landscape and differential access to new therapeutic modalities and local expertise.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsPractice Patterns, Physicians'AustraliaFemaleHumansNeoplasm StagingSurveys and QuestionnairesAustraliahepatocellular carcinomamultidisciplinary care teampatient care management

Identifiers

PMID41848345
PMCPMC13193405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.