ArticleClinical and translational gastroenterology2026
A Machine Learning-Based Clinical Tool for Predicting Inadequate Bowel Preparation: Development and Validation.
Article in Clinical and translational gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence for Perioperative Risk Prediction in Anesthesiology: A Bibliometric and Knowledge-Mapping Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionColonoscopy is an essential tool for diagnosing and treating colorectal diseases, with bowel preparation serving as a key determinant of its quality. This study aimed to develop and validate a machine learning model using nonpharmacological parameters to predict the risk of inadequate bowel preparation and develop a clinical risk assessment tool.
methodsClinical data were prospectively collected from patients who underwent colonoscopy with anesthesia at Beijing Tiantan Hospital from November 2024 to June 2025. Bowel preparation quality was evaluated using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale. Three feature selection methods and 5 machine learning algorithms were used to develop models and evaluate their predictive performance.
resultsSix factors were identified as predictive of inadequate bowel preparation. Cross-validation revealed that the Firth regression-based algorithm yielded an area under the operating characteristic curve (AUC) values of 0.718 (95% confidence interval: 0.647-0.789) for the training set and 0.715 (95% CI: 0.611-0.818) for the validation set, demonstrating balanced performance, calibration, and stability. The corresponding clinical prediction tool exhibited good discrimination [AUC, 0.709; 95% CI: 0.605-0.813] and calibration in the validation set, indicating its potential clinical value. DISCUSSION: Our findings indicate that body mass index, waist-to-hip ratio, a composite score of lower gastrointestinal symptoms, history of diabetes, and a composite smoking and alcohol intake score are significant risk factors of inadequate bowel preparation, and hematochezia exhibited the opposite effect. Overall, the Firth regression-based model and its associated risk prediction tool demonstrated good performance in identifying patients with inadequate bowel preparation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.