ArticleJournal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale
From Physiology to Intervention: Endoscopic Adenoid-to-Choanae Ratio Thresholds for Symptomatic Adenoid Hypertrophy in Preschool Children.
Article in Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ImportanceAdenoid enlargement in preschool children is commonly cited as a cause of nasal obstruction and sleep-disordered breathing, yet age-related lymphoid development complicates differentiation between physiological growth and clinically significant hypertrophy. Existing endoscopic grading schemes lack consensus on age-specific normative limits and clear management thresholds.ObjectiveThis study aimed to determine endoscopic adenoid-to-choanae (A/C) ratio cut-offs that discriminate symptomatic from asymptomatic preschool children and to propose a practical, management-oriented grading scale.DesignSTROBE.ParticipantsWe performed a retrospective analysis of 225 preschool children (age 3-7). Standardized history-taking, flexible nasopharyngoscopy, MASNA (Mucus on Adenoid Scale by Nasopharyngoscopy Assessment) mucus scoring, and tympanometry were performed.InterventionChildren were classified as symptomatic (≥2 "yes" responses to core symptom items) or asymptomatic (no more than one "occasionally" response). Adenoid size was quantified from blinded video review as the A/C ratio.Main Outcome MeasuresReceiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis identified an optimal A/C threshold for symptomatic status; multivariable logistic regression evaluated independent predictors.ResultsMedian A/C ratio was greater in symptomatic versus asymptomatic children. Symptomatic children also had higher MASNA mucus scores, greater reported rhinorrhea frequency, and less favorable tympanometric profiles. ROC analysis identified an A/C ratio of 60% as the optimal cut-off to discriminate symptomatic from asymptomatic children. An A/C ratio >60% emerged as the sole independent predictor of symptomatic status.ConclusionIn this cohort, the endoscopic A/C ratio strongly discriminated symptomatic from asymptomatic presentations. An A/C threshold of 60% reliably separated predominantly asymptomatic from symptomatic children.RelevanceThese findings, in conjunction with clinical experience and results from our previous studies, form the basis for a proposed three-tier, management-oriented endoscopic scale for preschool patients: Degree I (A/C ≤60%)-within age-appropriate norm; Degree II (A/C 65%-75%)-hypertrophy amenable to conservative management/observation; Degree III (A/C ≥80%)-hypertrophy for which we suggest that surgical intervention ought to be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.