ArticleJournal of minimally invasive surgery2026
A new laparoscopic technique for pediatric epigastric hernia repair: a feasibility case series.
Article in Journal of minimally invasive surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This report is a novel laparoscopic technique for pediatric epigastric hernia repair using 3-mm instruments and intracorporeal barbed sutures. A series of three children aged 3 to 6 years presented with a visible or palpable midline bulge, with or without intermittent pain. All had solitary epigastric defects confirmed by ultrasound. Laparoscopic repair was performed via three left lateral abdominal 3-mm ports, avoiding visible central incisions. Preperitoneal fat was reduced or excised, and the fascial defect was closed with a running barbed suture without knots. All patients were discharged the same day without complications. Follow-up up to 2 years revealed no recurrences and excellent cosmetic outcomes, with nearly invisible scars and high parental satisfaction. This technique offers a safe, effective, and cosmetically superior alternative to traditional open repair, especially in small children with central abdominal wall defects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.