Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41847747›Full record

ArticleTransfusion medicine (Oxford, England)2026

Motives and barriers to blood donation among adults aged over 50 years: A qualitative analysis.

Melissa K Hyde, Barbara M Masser, Rachel Thorpe, Aaron Akpu Philip, Amanda Salmon, Theresa L Scott, Tanya E Davison

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Melissa K HydeSchool of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9616-2028
Barbara M MasserSchool of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9385-6497
Rachel ThorpeResearch and Development, Australian Red Cross Lifeblood, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4415-9438
Aaron Akpu PhilipResearch and Development, Australian Red Cross Lifeblood, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7263-4430
Amanda SalmonSchool of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2043-0548
Theresa L ScottSchool of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6434-7121
Tanya E DavisonResearch and Innovation, Silverchain, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8106-7976

Funding

Australian Research Council LP220200819
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAgeing populations will increase demand for blood-products and donors who supply them. While blood collection agencies (BCAs) typically target younger people to expand supply, recruiting donors aged 50+ is also a potential solution. However, few studies focus exclusively on this group. We aimed to explore motives, barriers, costs, benefits, and BCA support and engagement of donors and non-donors aged 50+. METHODS/MATERIALS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 31 donors who began or returned to donating (after >25 years) aged 50+, and 28 non-donors aged 50+ who had never donated or not donated in >30 years. We used reflexive and codebook thematic analysis of data.

resultsSeven themes were generated: awareness of donation, accessibility and ease of donation, health and donation, age or life-stage and donation, helping self and others, social connections, and inspiration and incentives. Donors discussed their growing capacity for donation while others planned donation around busy lifestyles. Awareness of the need for blood motivated donors, alongside their desire to give back (i.e. reciprocity). Donors uniquely discussed their health privilege enabling donation and feeling obligated to help others less healthy. Non-donors lacked information and awareness about donating. Donation sites were viewed as inaccessible and family/work priorities limited capacity. Non-donors uniquely discussed being 'too old' to donate. They felt unwanted by and invisible to BCAs who do not target them in messaging/campaigns.

conclusionTo ensure sustainability of blood supplies and avoid marginalising those aged 50+, BCAs should be more inclusive with greater awareness raising, targeted marketing, and maximising accessible donation opportunities.

Indexed as

Blood DonationBlood DonorsMotivationAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Agedageingbarriersblood donationblood donorsdonor recruitmenteligibilityhealthmotives

Identifiers

PMID41847747
PMCPMC13670400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.