ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Invasive stratified mucin-producing carcinoma of the cervix: a report of 34 cases of immunohistochemical and clinicopathological findings.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This retrospective study aims to explore the immunohistochemical profile and clinicopathological features of invasive stratified mucin-producing carcinoma (ISMC). Methods: A total of 34 cases of ISMC were selected for this study. ISMCs are classified as either pure or mixed subtype, based on whether they are combined with tumor cells of other pathological types. We compared the clinicopathological features of ISMC with those of human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated cervical endocervical adenocarcinoma, as well as the differences between pure and mixed ISMC, through retrospective analyses. Results: Approximately 47% (16 out of 34) of the ISMC cases were classified as pure ISMC. There was no significant difference in clinicopathological features between pure ISMC and mixed ISMC. When compared to HPV-associated endocervical adenocarcinoma, ISMC cases presented with an earlier age of onset, larger tumor size, more aggressive biological behavior, and poorer prognosis. All cases exhibited block positivity for p16, positivity for CK7, and a higher Ki-67 labeling index. The expressions of CK5/6, Pax-8, P40, and P63 at the peripheral and mesenchymal junctions of the cancer foci were focally positive. Periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) staining demonstrated intra- and extracellular mucus in the cytoplasm of the tumor cells. Conclusion: The proportion of mixed ISMC cases is similar to that of pure ISMC. ISMC is more aggressive compared to HPV-associated endocervical adenocarcinoma and is associated with shorter progression-free survival. We recommend the following markers as a diagnostic panel for ISMC: p16, CK7, CK5/6, P40, P63, Pax-8, and PAS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.