ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Role of urinary leukocytes in the risk stratification of prostate cancer using nonlinear stacking learning strategy: a bi-cohort diagnostic study.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to develop a non-linear stacking ensemble learning framework to evaluate the incremental diagnostic contribution of urinary leukocytes (UL) in prostate cancer (PCa) risk stratification, with a primary focus on predictive performance and clinical utility. Methods: We retrospectively included 492 men with elevated PSA levels from Tongji Hospital (n = 415) and Xiangyang Central Hospital (n = 77). All patients underwent transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy and were classified into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk PCa according to the Gleason score. Clinical variables, including age, BMI, tPSA, f/tPSA, p2PSA, PHI, PHID, and PSAD, were collected and standardized. Feature selection was performed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression combined with bootstrap-based stability analysis. Based on the selected features, we constructed a non-linear stacking ensemble comprising decision tree, logistic regression, support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbors (KNN), and gradient boosting as base learners. Three-class risk stratification models were trained under two scenarios: with and without incorporation of UL. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), macro-F1 score, and the DeLong test. Calibration curves and decision curve analysis (DCA) were applied to quantify the incremental net clinical benefit associated with UL. Predefined subgroup analyses across PSA strata (<10, 10-20, >20 ng/mL) were conducted to examine the context-dependent contribution of UL. Results: In the baseline setting without UL, the non-linear stacking model achieved AUCs of 0.962 and 0.928 in the internal and external cohorts, respectively, indicating robust discriminative performance. After incorporating UL, several base learners-particularly decision tree, KNN, and gradient boosting-demonstrated center-specific AUC improvements ranging from 0.003 to 0.02 (p < 0.05), accompanied by consistently increased net clinical benefit on DCA. Subgroup analyses showed that the incremental value of UL was most evident in patients with intermediate PSA levels (4-10 ng/mL) and in those with clinical features suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Conclusion: Within a stacking ensemble-based risk stratification framework primarily optimized for predictive performance, urinary leukocytes provide a clinically meaningful auxiliary signal that improves discrimination and net benefit in specific PSA-defined subgroups. These findings support the use of UL as a complementary inflammation-related marker in PCa risk assessment, while interpretability is best understood at the level of base learners and original clinical features rather than the full ensemble model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.