Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41847626›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Evaluation of Pain and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life Associated With Fixed Orthodontic Treatment in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Omar A Rasol, Mohammad Y Hajeer, Ahmad S Burhan, Huda Abutayyem, Samer T Jaber, Alaa Oudah Ali Almusawi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Omar A RasolDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Damascus, Damascus, SYR.
Mohammad Y HajeerDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Damascus, Damascus, SYR.
Ahmad S BurhanDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Damascus, Damascus, SYR.
Huda AbutayyemDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Center of Medical and Bio-Allied Health Sciences Research, College of Dentistry, Ajman University, Ajman, ARE.
Samer T JaberDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Al-Wataniya Private University, Hama, SYR.
Alaa Oudah Ali AlmusawiDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Al-Knooz, Basrah, IRQ.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fixed orthodontic treatment is commonly associated with pain and discomfort, particularly during the initial stages, which may influence patient adherence and satisfaction; however, a comprehensive synthesis of evidence, specifically focused on the adult population, remains limited. This systematic review aimed to evaluate pain and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in adult patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment. Electronic searches were conducted up to August 2025 across multiple databases, including PubMed®, Web of Science™, Scopus®, Google™ Scholar, PsycINFO®, EMBASE®, and the Cochrane Library, with no restrictions on publication date or language. Observational studies, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) involving patients aged 18 years or older, treated with conventional fixed appliances, were included. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the RoB-2 and ROBINS-I tools. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 (The Cochrane Collaboration, The Nordic Cochrane Center, Copenhagen, Denmark), and the certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach. A total of 14 studies involving 1,022 adult patients were included, comprising seven RCTs, three CCTs, three cohort studies, and one cross-sectional study. The mean age of participants ranged from 18.87 to 38 years, with a female predominance of approximately 61%. Pain intensity peaked at 24 hours post-activation, with Visual Analog Scale scores ranging widely from 19.5 to 56.7. Meta-analysis of two studies revealed a statistically and clinically significant reduction in pain from day 1 to week 1 (mean difference = 20.83, 95% confidence interval: 11.70 to 29.97, p < 0.00001, I² = 67%), with pain continuing to decline over subsequent weeks. OHRQoL, primarily measured using the Oral Health Impact Profile-14, showed initial impairment, followed by significant improvement over time. However, the overall certainty of evidence for both outcomes was rated as very low to low. In conclusion, fixed orthodontic treatment in adult patients is consistently associated with moderate-to-high pain levels that peak around 24 hours and decrease significantly within the first week, while OHRQoL follows a parallel pattern of initial decline, followed by measurable improvement within the first month. Clinicians may use these findings to counsel adult patients and set realistic expectations regarding the transient nature of initial discomfort. Given the very low to low certainty of evidence, there is an urgent need for more well-designed longitudinal studies, with standardized outcome assessment time points and reporting metrics, to strengthen the evidence base.

Indexed as

discomfortfixed appliancesfixed orthodontic treatmentohip questionnaireoral-health-related quality of lifepainquality of life

Identifiers

PMID41847626
PMCPMC12991810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.