ArticleiScience2026
Development and multicenter validation of a predictive model for malignant pleural effusion recurrence.
Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early prediction of malignant pleural effusion (MPE) recurrence within 3 months is essential for optimizing management in lung cancer patients. This study developed and validated a machine learning model to estimate the 3-month recurrence risk of MPE in patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer. Using data from 221 patients for model training and 237 from two external validation cohorts, the Elastic Net model-based solely on four routine clinical features (treatment regimen, alanine aminotransferase, total pleural effusion volume, and tumor diameter)-achieved excellent performance, with areas under the curve of 0.848 and 0.940 in external validation. The model significantly outperformed other machine learning approaches. An interactive risk stratification tool was further developed to classify patients into four risk groups, enabling early identification and individualized management of high-risk patients. This tool offers a practical and generalizable solution for guiding clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.