Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41847526›Full record

ReviewClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2026

Management of Dry Eye Disease with Artificial Tears Containing Hyaluronic Acid and Trehalose: A Narrative Review.

Melissa Barnett, Michelle K Rhee, Kendall E Donaldson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Melissa BarnettBaker Optometry or Alpine Blue, Davis, CA, USA.
Michelle K RheeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Kendall E DonaldsonBascom Palmer Eye Institute of Plantation, Plantation, FL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dry eye disease (DED) is a growing global public health concern. The market for over-the-counter artificial tears, the mainstay treatment for DED, is also experiencing growth, driven by the rising prevalence of the condition and advancements in therapeutic formulations. The treatment landscape for DED is rapidly evolving, and currently marketed artificial tears vary in their active ingredients, use of preservatives, and formulations. Therefore, it is imperative to understand the breadth of management options and the evidence base of formulations to inform treatment decisions and treatment guidelines. In our narrative review, we provide an overview of the development and regulation of artificial tear formulations in the United States. We evaluate their active ingredients, formulations, and use of preservatives. Increasingly, preservative-free formulations are being developed that contain combinations of well-established active ingredients. In this context, a key focus of the narrative review is to critically analyze the novel, preservative-free, multidose formulation of hyaluronic acid and trehalose in artificial tears. We highlight its formulation and mechanism of action and its involvement in autophagy regulation and inflammatory response. We describe the strong and growing evidence base supporting the effectiveness and safety of this combination formulation of artificial tears in managing DED, and we also describe its use in postcataract surgery and in the real world.

Indexed as

artificial tearscombinationdry eyeefficacyhyaluronic acidsafetytrehalose

Identifiers

PMID41847526
PMCPMC12990230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.