ArticleInternational journal of women's health2026
Prolonged Second Stage of Labor in Thai Women: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in International journal of women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To assess the natural course of the second stage of labor in Thai women. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on singleton pregnancies during the second stage of labor, which were categorized into prolonged and non-prolonged groups using group-specific 95th-percentile cut-offs for nulliparous and multiparous women. The natural course of the second stage was evaluated, and adverse delivery outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results: When the 95th percentile was used to define prolonged second stages, durations of 80 and 58 minutes were the appropriate cut-offs for nulliparous and multiparous women, respectively, substantially shorter than those reported in other ethnic groups. Overall cesarean section rate (CSR) was very low (1.4%), with most of them performed in the prolonged group. After adjusting for confounders, a prolonged second stage was an independent risk of CSR (odds ratio: 175 and 221 for nulliparous and multiparous, respectively), operative vaginal delivery, low Apgar scores, and postpartum hemorrhage in both nulliparous and multiparous women. Cesarean deliveries were performed significantly earlier among multiparas but the CSR was comparable. Conclusion: The second stage of labor in Thai women is markedly shorter than that reported in Western populations. The definition of a prolonged second stage should be tailored to specific ethnic populations, and the current ACOG/SMFM criteria may not be appropriate for Thai women. Among the Thai population, cut-off values of 80 minutes for nulliparous women and 60 minutes for multiparous women may be appropriate for defining a prolonged second stage. A prolonged second stage markedly increased the rates of cesarean section rate, operative vaginal delivery, low Apgar scores and postpartum hemorrhage. However, the overall cesarean rate during the second stage remained very low in Thai women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.