Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41847470›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of women's health2026

Random Survival Forest Model for Predicting Recurrence of Postoperative Ovarian Endometrioma.

Yayun Zhang, Meng Liu, Zihan Zhao, Yan Zhang, Shunyu Hou, Aifen Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yayun ZhangDepartment of Gynecology, Suzhou Municipal Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, 215001, People's Republic of China.
Meng LiuDepartment of Gynecology, Suzhou Municipal Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, 215001, People's Republic of China.
Zihan ZhaoDepartment of Epidemiology, George Washington University Milken Institute School of Public Health, Washington, DC, 20037, USA.
Yan ZhangDepartment of Gynecology, Suzhou Municipal Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, 215001, People's Republic of China.
Shunyu HouDepartment of Gynecology, Suzhou Municipal Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, 215001, People's Republic of China.
Aifen WangDepartment of Gynecology, Jiangnan University Medical Center, Wuxi, Jiangsu, 214002, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To develop and compare a random survival forest (RSF) model and a Cox regression model-for predicting postoperative recurrence in patients with ovarian endometrioma. Methods: The primary outcomes of the study were the recurrence of ovarian endometrioma and the time to recurrence. Recurrence-related clinical variables were assessed using two methods: Cox regression analysis and the random survival forest algorithm. The performance of the prediction models was evaluated using time dependent Receiver Operating Characteristic (time-dependent ROC) curve, calibration curve, and Decision Curve Analysis (DCA) curve. Results: 109 patients experienced recurrence of postoperative ovarian endometrioma, while 469 patients did not experience recurrence. The multivariate Cox regression model identified four independent variables. The RSF model was constructed using 12 important clinical variables. In the training set, the Cox model presented a lower C-index compared to the RSF model (0.699 vs. 0.987). However, in the testing set, the Cox model had a slightly higher C-index compared to the RSF model (0.771 vs. 0.763). The classification accuracy of the RSF model and the traditional Cox regression model was evaluated using two performance metrics: NRI and IDI. The NRI at 3 years and 5 years were 0.728 and 0.775 respectively. The IDI at 3 years and 5 years were 0.599 and 0.603 respectively. Conclusion: The predictive performance of the RSF model was slightly better than that of the traditional Cox model for predicting postoperative recurrence in patients with ovarian endometrioma.

Indexed as

cox modelovarian endometriomaprognosisrandom survival forest

Identifiers

PMID41847470
PMCPMC12991307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.