ArticleJournal of the Saudi Heart Association2025
Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Replacement (TPVR): A Saudi Consensus Statement.
Article in Journal of the Saudi Heart Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Teaching points in anesthetic management for transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement: a case series.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To provide an expert consensus on the appropriate use of transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement (TPVR) in managing chronic pulmonary regurgitation (PR), particularly in patients with congenital heart defects such as Tetralogy of Fallot (TOF). The consensus aims to address current practices, patient selection criteria, procedural planning, and device-specific considerations to guide clinicians in optimizing outcomes. Methods: A multidisciplinary panel reviewed existing literature, clinical guidelines, and real-world practices. Key domains covered include epidemiology, anatomical and hemodynamic evaluation, pre- and post-procedural imaging, device characteristics, and patient selection. Imaging modalities such as echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), and computed tomography (CT) were critically appraised for their role in procedural planning. Recommendations were structured to reflect best practices across varied healthcare settings. Results: TPVR is increasingly adopted as a less invasive alternative to surgical pulmonary valve replacement. Devices such as Melody, SAPIEN, Harmony, and Venus P-valve are used based on RVOT anatomy and size. Pre-procedural imaging and multidisciplinary assessment are critical for safe deployment and optimal valve positioning. TPVR demonstrated favourable outcomes in terms of RV remodelling, PR and PS reduction, functional improvement, and reduced hospital stay compared to surgical approaches. Complications such as tricuspid valve injury, stent fracture, and infective endocarditis remain concerns. Conclusions: TPVR offers a safe and effective treatment for selected patients with PR or PS following congenital heart disease repair. A standardized, imaging-guided approach with multidisciplinary oversight is essential. Further research is needed to assess long-term valve durability and to refine strategies for high-risk and paediatric populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.