Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41847419›Full record

ArticleNeurobiology of stress2026

The adrenal is doing what it's supposed to do, you just don't understand it.

Christina Y Cantave, Megan Gunnar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurobiology of stress, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Christina Y CantaveInstitute of Child Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States.
Megan GunnarInstitute of Child Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exposure to early life adversity is thought to induce long-term alterations in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis activity and regulation, particularly when such experiences occur during periods of rapid neurodevelopment in early childhood. Although this hypothesis is well supported in animal research, evidence in humans remains comparatively limited and less well understood. The present review synthesizes current evidence on the immediate and long-term impact of adversity experienced roughly in the first 5 years of life, focusing on two forms of severe adverse caregiving: early institutional care and child maltreatment. Across studies, children exposed to early adverse care show persistent alterations in HPA axis activity under both basal and stress-related conditions, extending from infancy to adulthood. We examine how the developmental timing, duration and severity of exposure, as well as the caregiving context, affect these outcomes, and highlight emerging evidence of potential recalibration of the HPA axis during puberty following marked changes (for good or bad) in caregiving quality. We conclude by outlining the implications of this body of work for understanding the programming effects of early adversity and by identifying key methodological limitations and priorities for future research. In particular, longitudinal designs with repeated assessments, combined with integrative multisystem resilience-oriented approaches, are essential. This should be integrated with and neurobiological grounded by, mechanistic animal studies. Together, these efforts will help elucidate how and when early adversity becomes biologically embedded across child development.

Indexed as

Child abuse and neglectChild maltreatmentCortisolDevelopmental timingEarly adversityEarly institutional careHPA axis

Identifiers

PMID41847419
PMCPMC12989848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.