Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41847408›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026

We are still in it: a conceptual model for moral injury and burnout in alternative response programs to guide intervention.

Miranda Worthen, Soma De Bourbon, Omar Breedlove, Courtney Ewing, Joseph Graterol, Amelia Harmon, Nakia Hines, Erik Lundgren, Michael Mason, Michael Marchiselli and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Miranda WorthenDepartment of Public Health, San José State University, San José, CA, United States.
Soma De BourbonDepartment of Sociology and Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, San José State University, San José, CA, United States.
Omar BreedloveRichmond Area Multi-Services (RAMS), Inc., San Francisco, CA, United States.
Courtney EwingRichmond Area Multi-Services (RAMS), Inc., San Francisco, CA, United States.
Joseph GraterolSan Francisco Fire Department, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Amelia HarmonRichmond Area Multi-Services (RAMS), Inc., San Francisco, CA, United States.
Nakia HinesRichmond Area Multi-Services (RAMS), Inc., San Francisco, CA, United States.
Erik LundgrenRichmond Area Multi-Services (RAMS), Inc., San Francisco, CA, United States.
Michael MasonSan Francisco Fire Department, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Michael MarchiselliRichmond Area Multi-Services (RAMS), Inc., San Francisco, CA, United States.
Vania MendozaRichmond Area Multi-Services (RAMS), Inc., San Francisco, CA, United States.
Khoa NguyenRichmond Area Multi-Services (RAMS), Inc., San Francisco, CA, United States.
Britt RubinRichmond Area Multi-Services (RAMS), Inc., San Francisco, CA, United States.
April SloanSan Francisco Fire Department, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Shira MaguenMental Health Service, San Francisco VA Health Care System, San Francisco, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: About 20% of police calls involve a person experiencing a behavioral health crisis. To better address these community member's needs and reduce risk of harm, jurisdictions are developing programs that shift calls for crises related to homelessness, addiction, and mental health to non-law enforcement alternatives. In responding to these calls, first responders working in these alternative response programs are exposed to a different set of moral dilemmas and pressures, increasing their risk of developing moral injury. Methods: The Alternative Response Program Moral Injury and Burnout Model highlights causes of exposure to potentially morally injurious events and the interplay between moral distress, moral injury, and burnout among first responders working in alternative response programs. The conceptual model was developed through a multi-year participatory action research (PAR) study with members of a large urban alternative response program. The article draws on a highly diverse set of data sources that contributed to the development and refinement of the model, including focus group discussions, analysis of call logs, assessment of moral injury, and reflective conversations with members and leaders of the alternative response program. Through our collaboration, we identified contributory factors that can produce moral injury and opportunities for interventions to mitigate moral injury. We piloted several interventions collaboratively developed with team members and hypothesized to reduce moral distress and injury based on this model. Results: Our model explains sources of moral dilemmas and how these can lead to moral distress, moral injury, and burnout. The model also points to intervention pathways to reduce or prevent these outcomes. We provide illustrations of how moral injury arises, using data from the program members, describe six pathways, and share examples for how moral injury may be mitigated. Discussion: Despite scarce research in first responders, moral injury and burnout are growing concerns in alternative response programs. Our goal was to amplify participants' voices to highlight both their struggles as well as proposed interventions fostering resilience. Through close collaboration, we developed a moral injury model that resonates for these first responders and can guide a better understanding of issues and pathways for interventions among high-risk occupational groups.

Indexed as

burnoutemergency medical technicians (EMTs)moral distressmoral injuryparamedicsparticipatory action research (PAR)peer support specialists

Identifiers

PMID41847408
PMCPMC12989973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.