ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
We are still in it: a conceptual model for moral injury and burnout in alternative response programs to guide intervention.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Moral injury research at a crossroads: assumptions, limitations, and the promise of relational reorientation.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: About 20% of police calls involve a person experiencing a behavioral health crisis. To better address these community member's needs and reduce risk of harm, jurisdictions are developing programs that shift calls for crises related to homelessness, addiction, and mental health to non-law enforcement alternatives. In responding to these calls, first responders working in these alternative response programs are exposed to a different set of moral dilemmas and pressures, increasing their risk of developing moral injury. Methods: The Alternative Response Program Moral Injury and Burnout Model highlights causes of exposure to potentially morally injurious events and the interplay between moral distress, moral injury, and burnout among first responders working in alternative response programs. The conceptual model was developed through a multi-year participatory action research (PAR) study with members of a large urban alternative response program. The article draws on a highly diverse set of data sources that contributed to the development and refinement of the model, including focus group discussions, analysis of call logs, assessment of moral injury, and reflective conversations with members and leaders of the alternative response program. Through our collaboration, we identified contributory factors that can produce moral injury and opportunities for interventions to mitigate moral injury. We piloted several interventions collaboratively developed with team members and hypothesized to reduce moral distress and injury based on this model. Results: Our model explains sources of moral dilemmas and how these can lead to moral distress, moral injury, and burnout. The model also points to intervention pathways to reduce or prevent these outcomes. We provide illustrations of how moral injury arises, using data from the program members, describe six pathways, and share examples for how moral injury may be mitigated. Discussion: Despite scarce research in first responders, moral injury and burnout are growing concerns in alternative response programs. Our goal was to amplify participants' voices to highlight both their struggles as well as proposed interventions fostering resilience. Through close collaboration, we developed a moral injury model that resonates for these first responders and can guide a better understanding of issues and pathways for interventions among high-risk occupational groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.