ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2026
Impact of transport source (dairy farms vs. collection center) and post-arrival housing in combination with prophylactic antibiotic treatment on performance, lung health and microbiota of veal calves.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transport via a collection center and early life administration of antibiotics are two major challenges faced by calves in current veal husbandry management. The main aim of this proof of concept study was to investigate the effects of these two factors on fecal microbiota, lung immunity, and overall health of veal calves. The study had a 2 × 2 factorial design with the following factors: source of calves [transport via a collection center (CC) or direct transport from dairy farms (DF)], and early-life administration of antibiotics (AB or no AB). The hypothesis was that direct transport and AB use may positively affect the health of calves. A total of 89 bull calves and 5 heifers, aged two to 4 weeks, and with average 46.4 ± 5.1 kg body weight (BW) at arrival were included in the study. The study was performed in two consecutive batches, and calves were followed for a period of 8 weeks. At arrival, animals were housed in groups of three calves/pen divided over six rooms. Calves from the DF were housed in separate rooms, whereas CC calves were housed in multiple pens per room. The AB-treatments received an oral antibiotics/antiphlogistic treatment via the milk replacer on day 4 after arrival. On day 21 and 45, fecal samples and broncho-alveolar lavage fluid (BALF) were collected, whereas nasal swabs were collected on day 7 for microbiota analysis. Blood samples were collected on day 1, 7, 21, 35, 45, and 51 for the complete hematological profile and immune cells. Body weights were recorded upon arrival, and day 28 and 49, and clinical observations were conducted twice a week throughout the experiment. Post-mortem examinations were also performed. Calves sourced from CC and not receiving AB (CC_No AB) had the lowest percentage of alveolar macrophages, the highest incidence of clinical problems and the lowest BW at the end of the trial. Fecal Shannon index and Pielou's evenness was reduced in CC_AB calves compared to all other treatments. Calves sourced via CC showed a higher lung/heart ratio and more abnormalities in the lungs compared to DF calves. Overall, this study showed that transportation via a CC without subsequent treatment with AB represented the greatest challenge on clinical health, immunity, and fecal microbiota of veal calves.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.