Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41847328›Full record

ArticleIJTLD open2026

The impact of non-TB mycobacterial co-isolation in patients with pulmonary TB.

S Samari, S K Brode, H K Mah, M S Brar, N F Sabur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IJTLD open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

S SamariDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
S K BrodeDivision of Respirology, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
H K MahDivision of Respirology, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
M S BrarDepartment of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
N F SaburDivision of Respirology, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPulmonary TB is diagnosed by isolating

methodsWe conducted a retrospective study of pulmonary TB patients treated at West Park Healthcare Centre between 2010 and 2020. Demographics, microbiologic data, and clinical outcomes were extracted. Patients with NTM co-isolation were compared to those with TB-alone.

resultsAmong 771 patients, 284 co-isolated NTM. These patients were older (median 58 vs. 49 years) and more often had diabetes (28.5% vs. 18.7%). They had longer time to sputum culture conversion (56 vs. 45.5 days) and were less likely to achieve sputum culture conversion (73.1% vs. 82.7%). NTM co-isolated patients had more persistent cough and sputum at treatment completion.

conclusionNTM co-isolation in TB occurs more commonly in older patients, and those with diabetes. Patients who co-isolate NTM during TB treatment are less likely to culture convert, have a longer time to culture conversion, and have more end-of-treatment symptoms.

Indexed as

NTM pulmonary diseasepulmonary TBsputum conversion

Identifiers

PMID41847328
PMCPMC12991760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.