Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41847284›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2026

Transforming customer experience in social robotics through explainable and interpretable artificial intelligence over a decade.

Anshu S Arora, Amit Arora, John R McIntyre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anshu S AroraSchool of Business and Public Administration, University of the District of Columbia, Washington, DC, United States.
Amit AroraSchool of Business and Public Administration, University of the District of Columbia, Washington, DC, United States.
John R McIntyreScheller College of Business, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past decade, the field of social robotics has witnessed significant advancements in enhancing user experience (UX) and customer experience (CX) through the integration of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) and Interpretable Artificial Intelligence (IAI). This research presents a review that examines the progress made over a decade (2015-2025) in developing frameworks for social robotics and human-robot interaction (HRI) that prioritize transparency, trust, and user engagement. The journey began with early efforts to equip social robots with internal needs and motivations, forming the basis for understandable self-explanations. As the field progressed, there was a shift towards more user-centered approaches, autonomous social behavior, and self-explanations. By the early 2020s, researchers had begun to focus on the specific applications of XAI and IAI in social robotics. Past studies have shown that explainable and interpretable AI systems in social robots contributed to sustained user engagement and improved CX over extended periods. Currently, by 2025, the field has matured considerably, with researchers developing comprehensive frameworks that seamlessly integrated UX/CX considerations in social robotics with an emphasis on ethical considerations and societal implications. This research highlights how the past decade has seen remarkable progress in enhancing UX/CX in social robotics through XAI and IAI.

Indexed as

customer experience (CX)explainable artificial intelligence (XAI)human-robot interaction (HRI)interpretable AI (IAI)long-term human-robot trust and relationshipssocial roboticssocio-behavioral interpretabilitytransparency

Identifiers

PMID41847284
PMCPMC12989559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.