ArticleCurrent developments in nutrition2026
Healthcare Providers' Perceptions and Experiences of Prenatal Iron and Folic Acid Supplementation-A Qualitative Study in Botswana.
Article in Current developments in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The World Health Organization recommends daily iron and folic acid (IFA) supplementation during pregnancy to prevent maternal anemia and adverse birth outcomes such as preterm birth. However, uptake of IFA has varied substantially in low- and middle-income countries due to issues regarding supply, knowledge, access to health services, and acceptability. In Botswana, nearly one-third of pregnant women do not receive IFA. Methods: We conducted qualitative interviews with 2 key stakeholder groups at 2 different levels: the individual level (pregnant women) and the service delivery level (healthcare providers). In this study, we present results from 16 interviews with healthcare providers at 2 representative antenatal clinic sites in Botswana in 2022-8 nurse/midwives, 4 pharmacists, 2 dieticians, and 2 Ministry of Health sexual and reproductive health officials. Results: Healthcare providers were knowledgeable about the benefits of IFA supplementation and prescribed supplements when available. Several key barriers were identified: lack of availability of supplements due to frequent and long-lasting stockouts, late antenatal care registration, nonadherence and side effects, costs, and cultural and traditional beliefs. Healthcare providers indicated that foods rich in IFA were available and that fortification of staple foods with IFA would be feasible and acceptable. Conclusions: Our study identified an urgent need to increase the availability of IFA supplementation at antenatal clinics, with the ultimate goal of improving maternal and infant outcomes. In addition, addressing patient concerns around side effects and providing foods fortified with IFA to pregnant women could improve maternal and infant health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.