ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing2026
Self-management of reflux symptoms after esophagectomy in China: A qualitative study.
Article in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This qualitative study aimed to explore the self-management experiences, expectations, and needs of Chinese patients experiencing reflux symptoms after esophagectomy, guided by the Integrated Theory of Health Behavior Change (ITHBC). Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 18 patients who had undergone esophagectomy, selected via maximum variation sampling. Data were analyzed using directed content analysis based on the ITHBC framework, focusing on three domains: knowledge and beliefs, self-regulation skills, and social facilitation. Results: Our analysis identified three core themes reflecting significant gaps in current supportive care: the need for actionable knowledge, as patients struggled with complex medical information and desired simplified explanations, standardized symptom assessment, and long-term risk management guidance; the need for personalized self-regulation skills, with difficulties reported in implementing dietary adjustments, posture management, and self-monitoring due to a lack of tailored guidance; and the need for continuous and collaborative support, as existing support from health care providers, family, and peers was often fragmented or insufficient. These findings underscore a systemic misalignment between patient needs and clinical support, highlighting an urgent demand for more integrated, practical, and accessible self-management resources. Conclusions: Significant gaps exist between patient needs and current supportive care practices. There is an urgent need for tailored interventions, including metaphor-based education, structured skill training, enhanced social support, and digitally accessible micro-learning resources, to improve self-management outcomes in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.