ArticleJTO clinical and research reports2026
Brief Report: Multi-Institution Real-World Analysis Evaluating Safety, Efficacy, and ctDNA Dynamics After Tarlatamab in Patients With Previously Treated SCLC and LCNEC.
Article in JTO clinical and research reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transcription Factor Subtype Governs Response and Resistance to DLL3-Directed T-Cell Engagement in Small Cell Lung Cancer.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- DLL3-directed immune redirection in small-cell lung cancer: a lineage-defined vulnerability that doubles as an escape route.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tarlatamab, a bispecific T-cell engager targeting delta-like ligand 3 and CD3 on T cells, has generated impressive treatment response rates in relapsed extensive-stage SCLC and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. We performed a retrospective, multi-institutional analysis of 48 patients who received tarlatamab as standard of care to assess how safety and efficacy outcomes translate into real-world practice. Rates of cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome were 54% and 33%, respectively, with most being grades 1 to 2 in severity (100% and 87.5%). Of the 30 patients included in our efficacy analysis, the best overall response rate was 67% and disease control rate was 73%. With median follow-up of 5.7 months, median progression-free survival was 4.9 months (95% confidence interval: 4-not reached) and median overall survival was not reached (95% confidence interval: 4.8-not reached). Nine patients underwent molecular response assessment, with circulating tumor DNA trends corresponding with radiographic response. In this multicenter cohort study, tarlatamab continued to demonstrate encouraging response rates and progression-free survival; however, differences were observed in rates and timing of key treatment-associated toxicities compared with previous trial data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.