Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41847109›Full record

ArticleiScience2026

Two distinct attentional priorities guide exploratory and exploitative gaze.

Xuan Wen, Alireza Seyed Hassani, Adam Neumann, Paul Tiesinga, Thilo Womelsdorf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xuan WenDepartment of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240, USA.
Alireza Seyed HassaniDepartment of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240, USA.
Adam NeumannDepartment of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240, USA.
Paul TiesingaDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Nijmegen, 6525 Nijmegen EN, the Netherlands.
Thilo WomelsdorfDepartment of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240, USA.

Funding

Neural Mechanisms of Learning Relevance in Multidimensional EnvironmentsR01MH123687 · NIMH · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI WOMELSDORF, THILO · 2021 to 2025
$3.2M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH123687
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gaze is directed to visual objects that are informative, reward-predictive, or novel. These gaze preferences may reflect the influence of separable attention systems that prioritize items conveying uncertainty versus items with known expected reward. We tested this hypothesis in nonhuman primates learning feature-based attention to objects that had either previously learned reward associations or were novel. Reward history slowed down learning by attracting fixations to features that were previously targets. This feature-specific reward history bias persisted in fixations used to choose objects even after learning was completed. In contrast, exploratory fixations preceding a choice showed negligible history biases. Modeling the exploratory value of object features confirmed that exploratory fixations were unaffected by reward history, while exploitative fixations showed persistent feature-specific reward history biases. These findings suggest that gaze is guided by two separable attentional priorities: exploratory attention prioritizing uncertain items, and exploitative attention guiding gaze to current and previously goal-relevant features.

Indexed as

Behavioral neuroscienceBiological sciencesNeuroscience

Identifiers

PMID41847109
PMCPMC12991844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.