ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2026
Pyoderma gangrenosum: a case report highlighting the importance of early diagnosis and treatment.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is a rare neutrophilic dermatosis that occurs spontaneously or after trauma, including surgery - a phenomenon known as pathergy. Postsurgical PG (PSPG) is often misdiagnosed as a pyogenic infection, leading to inappropriate interventions. Surgeons should be familiar with this complication, especially in resource-limited settings where access to specialty care is limited. Early recognition and prompt treatment significantly improve outcomes. Presentation of Case: A 65-year-old male developed erythema and edema surrounding the incision, and systemic inflammation within 48 hours of elective left inguinal hernia repair. Despite oral antibiotics, the wound rapidly deteriorated by postoperative day 6 (POD6). Repeated cultures remained negative. Markedly increased C-reactive protein (CRP) and ferritin indicated severe systemic inflammation, prompting a presumptive diagnosis of PSPG. High-dose IV corticosteroids were initiated on POD7 with rapid clinical improvement in erythema, edema, and ulceration size. He was transitioned to oral prednisone and later to oral cyclosporine, achieving complete re-epithelialization by POD32. Colchicine was initiated for maintenance therapy. Molecular testing revealed a PLCG2 mutation. One year later, a subsequent surgical procedure was performed utilizing prophylactic immunosuppression without recurrent PSPG. Discussion: This case highlights the diagnostic challenge of PSPG. Misdiagnosis may lead to surgical debridement that can worsen the condition due to pathergy. Immunosuppressive therapy, avoidance of additional trauma, and prophylactic immunosuppression prior to subsequent surgeries are mainstays of treatment. Emerging genetic associations, such as PLCG2 mutations, offer insight into the pathogenesis of PSPG. Conclusion: Early clinical recognition and prompt immunosuppression are central to management. Serial patient-acquired photographs can support monitoring and guide treatment decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.