Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41847067›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Neural correlates in the time course of inferences: costs and benefits for less-skilled readers at the university level.

Mabel Urrutia, Esteban J Pino, María Troncoso-Seguel, Claudio Bustos, Pamela Guevara, Karina Torres-Ocampo, Sandra Mariángel, Yang Fu, Hipólito Marrero

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mabel UrrutiaFacultad de Educación, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile.
Esteban J PinoFacultad de Ingenieria, Universidad de Concepcion, Concepción, Chile.
María Troncoso-SeguelFacultad de Ingenieria, Universidad de Concepcion, Concepción, Chile.
Claudio BustosFacultad de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad de Concepcion, Concepción, Chile.
Pamela GuevaraFacultad de Ingenieria, Universidad de Concepcion, Concepción, Chile.
Karina Torres-OcampoFacultad de Humanidades y Arte, Universidad de Concepcion, Concepción, Chile.
Sandra MariángelFaculty of Education, Universidad Católica de la Santísima, Concepción, Chile.
Yang FuInstitute of Language, Shanghai International Studies University, Shanghai, China.
Hipólito MarreroFacultad de Psicologia y Logopedia, Universidad de La Laguna, San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates the costs and benefits of inference processing in university students with reading comprehension difficulties. Inferences, which combine implicit and explicit information, are seen as an indicator of better reading comprehension. The study focuses on three loci during narration: the last words of the first and second phrases, and a target word in a lexical decision task. Brain activity was recorded using event-related potentials (ERP) from 63 students as they read familiar, less-familiar, and neutral stories. The results revealed a slow negativity component at the first locus, with greater negativity for words from familiar contexts compared to less-familiar and neutral contexts. At the second locus, N400 and Post-N400 components reflected greater negativity for familiar contexts. At the third locus, FN400 and N400 components were observed for pseudowords. These findings suggest a bottom-up processing strategy, characterized by lexical access difficulties in less-skilled readers.

Indexed as

event-related potentialsFN400inferencesless-skilled readersN400post N400slow negativity potential

Identifiers

PMID41847067
PMCPMC12989520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.