ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
K-12 students' basic psychological needs satisfaction in online learning: perceived level, group difference, and its influence.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Basic psychological need satisfaction and creativity among university students: the mediating role of intrinsic motivation.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In the post-pandemic educational landscape, online learning has become increasingly embedded in K-12 education. Self-determination theory claims that satisfying basic psychological needs is critical in student learning. Despite numerous empirical researches on basic psychological needs, there remains limited understanding of K-12 students' perceived level, group differences of basic psychological needs satisfaction in online learning and its influence on online learning engagement. Objectives: This study aims to (i) examine K-12 students' perceived levels of basic psychological needs satisfaction in online learning; (ii) analyze group differences based on gender and grade level; and (iii) test the influence of need satisfaction on cognitive, behavioral, and emotional engagement in online learning. Methodology: A quantitative study was employed. Data were collected from 1,073 K-12 students across 10 schools in China using stratified random sampling. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, independent samples Results: Results indicated that most students reported moderate levels of psychological needs satisfaction, with few reporting high levels. Significant differences were found across grade levels: middle school students reported higher satisfaction than both elementary and high school students, and elementary students scored higher than high school students; no significant gender differences were observed. Regression analyses revealed that autonomy and competence significantly predicted all three dimensions of engagement. Competence emerged as the strongest predictor. Relatedness significantly predicted emotional and behavioral engagement but not cognitive engagement. Conclusion and implications: These findings extend Self-Determination Theory to the context of K-12 online learning and highlight the differential roles of the three basic needs. The results underscore the importance of designing online instruction that enhances competence and autonomy to promote student engagement. Educational policymakers and practitioners should consider grade-specific strategies to better support students' basic psychological needs in digital environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.