ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Detecting Extrachromosomal DNA from Routine Histopathology.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Extrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA) is a major driver of oncogene amplification, tumour heterogeneity and poor clinical outcomes [1-3], yet its detection relies on specialised genomic assays that are not integrated into routine diagnostics. Here, we show that ecDNA status can be inferred directly from standard haematoxylin and eosin-stained whole-slide pathology images. We develop an end-to-end, weakly supervised deep learning framework that aggregates thousands of high-magnification patches per slide with slide-level augmentation and interpretable attention. Across twelve cancer types from The Cancer Genome Atlas, the approach identifies tumours with genomic amplifications and, critically, distinguishes ecDNA-amplified from chromosomally amplified or non-amplified tumours, with the strongest signal in glioblastoma. Attention maps localise regions enriched for nuclei with altered chromatin intensity and texture, and predicted ecDNA status recapitulates its adverse association with survival. These results indicate that ecDNA amplifications leave reproducible histomorphologic foot-prints detectable by routine pathology, enabling scalable screening to prioritise tumours for confirmatory molecular testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.