ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Improving confidence of differential transcription calls in enhancers.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Motivation: Most disease-associated genetic variants reside within transcribed regulatory elements (tREs). Patterns of differential transcription at tREs can be leveraged to identify upstream regulators and link enhancers to their target genes. But the low transcription levels and high variability in tREs makes identifying high confidence differentially transcribed elements challenging. Results: We present Mu Counts and TFEA-LE, two algorithms for robust identification of differentially transcribed tREs. The first step in accurate identification of differentially transcribed tREs is to obtain accurate RNA lengths and therefore counts over these regions. To this end we developed a method of accurate length inference (LIET-EMG) as wll as a rapid method for counting reads over tREs (Mu Counts). Armed with newly identified and quantified tREs, TFEA-LE then integrates motif information to simultaneously identify responsive tREs and their likely upstream regulators. We show improved precision and recall over general-purpose tools (e.g. DESeq2) in detecting p53-responsive tREs. We then clarify TF-specific responses within multi-TF perturbations in lung cells. Finally we show that the TFEA-LE approach improves TF activity inference, including in complex perturbations where many TFs respond. TFEA-LE is especially effective in technically challenging datasets, whether due to highly specific or broad responses, outliers, or high GC content. Ultimately, these methods advance the systematic characterization of individual tREs, enabling their integration with regulators, target genes, and disease-associated variants for translational research. Availability and Implementation: TFEA-LE: https://github.com/Dowell-Lab/TFEA/tree/Leadedge. Nextflow pipeline to run Mu Counts: https://github.com/Dowell-Lab/BidirCountingAnalysis. LIET (including modifications for tREs): https://github.com/Dowell-Lab/LIET/tree/LIETEMGtoo. Source code for this work: https://github.com/Dowell-Lab/ImprovingtREAnalysisPaper. Contact: robin.dowell@colorado.edu.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.