ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
The role of the locus coeruleus in eye movements during perceptual decision making.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The locus coeruleus (LC) is the primary source of norepinephrine in the brain and has been implicated in the processes of attention, arousal, and perceptual decision making. Although prior work has linked transient LC activation to both sensory stimulus processing and motor processing, the precise contribution of LC to the distinct sensory and motor components of perceptual decisions remains unclear. Here, we recorded the spiking activity of single LC neurons in rhesus macaques while they performed a visual two-alternative forced-choice change detection task with a saccadic report, designed to cleanly dissociate sensory and motor contributions to LC activity. We found that the large majority of recorded neurons showed robust increases in response tightly locked to the choice saccade, while only a small fraction showed significant responses to the visual stimuli. Saccade-aligned LC responses did not vary with behavioral outcome, perceptual difficulty, reaction time, or session-wide fluctuations in perceptual sensitivity and criterion, indicating that LC motor-related signals were dissociated from perceptual performance. Together, these results demonstrated the existence of a subpopulation of LC neurons whose activity was tightly coupled to oculomotor output across both voluntary and involuntary eye movements during perceptual decision making, but were independent of perceptual decision accuracy. Our findings support a role for LC in facilitating motor preparation and execution in response to behaviorally significant sensory events.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.