ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
Occupational silica exposure drives systemic immune dysregulation and tumor microenvironment susceptibility: evidence from a real-world study.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Occupational exposure to carcinogenic dusts such as silica is a well-established risk factor for cancer. However, the molecular mechanisms linking early exposure to tumor-promoting microenvironmental changes remain poorly defined. Emerging evidence suggests that chronic immune dysregulation and remodeling of the tumor microenvironment (TME) may serve as critical intermediates. Methods: We analyzed occupational health data from 5,482 industrial workers in Anhui Province, China. Explainable machine learning models were constructed using exposure profiles and hematological immune parameters to predict carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) positivity, with feature contributions interpreted via SHAP values. Experimental validation involved silica-stimulated THP-1 monocytes and colorectal cancer (CRC) cell lines to assess inflammatory activation and paracrine regulation of CEA. Silica- and CRC-associated genes were integrated from public databases to construct protein-protein interaction networks, identify hub genes, and evaluate prognostic significance using TCGA and GSE39582 datasets. Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) analysis was used to resolve cell type-specific expression patterns. Results: Among 14 algorithms tested, CatBoost exhibited the highest predictive performance for CEA positivity. SHAP analysis highlighted the monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio and silica exposure as dominant contributors. Mediation analysis confirmed that systemic inflammation partially mediated the silica-CEA association. Conclusions: Occupational silica exposure induces macrophage-driven inflammatory signaling that promotes early CEA elevation and TME remodeling. Integrating machine learning with experimental and multi-omics validation provides a translational framework for identifying exposure-responsive biomarkers and immune-related cancer risk in occupational settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.