ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Multimodal imaging features of non-proliferative and proliferative diabetic retinopathy based on SD-OCT and fundus autofluorescence.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Topographical Evaluation of Neovessels in Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy by Using a Multimodal Imaging Approach.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To characterize and compare multimodal imaging features of non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and fundus autofluorescence (FAF). Methods: This cross-sectional observational study included 132 patients (219 eyes) with DR (120 NPDR eyes and 99 PDR eyes) and 73 healthy controls (129 eyes). All participants underwent comprehensive ophthalmic examinations, including fundus photography, fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA), FAF, and SD-OCT. OCT biomarkers, including hyperreflective foci (HRF), intraretinal cystic cavities (IRC), diabetic macular edema (DME), disorganization of retinal inner layers (DRIL), epiretinal membrane (ERM), posterior vitreous detachment (PVD), subretinal fluid (SRF), and disruption of the external limiting membrane (ELM) and ellipsoid zone (EZ) were systematically evaluated and compared between groups. Results: Hyperreflective foci, IRC, DME, PVD, and ERM were significantly more frequent in PDR eyes than in NPDR eyes (all Conclusion: Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography and FAF provide complementary information for evaluating structural and functional retinal alterations in DR. FAF is particularly useful for visualizing hemorrhage, DME, and fibroproliferative membranes. In contrast, SD-OCT enables detailed assessment of multiple retinal biomarkers. The high prevalence of epiretinal membranes highlights their potential role in DR progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.