Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41846870›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2025

Improving radiation therapy efficacy considering DNA repair, TP53 mutations, microscopic heterogeneity, and low- and high-dose apoptosis.

Anders Brahme

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Anders BrahmeDepartment of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

All radiation types produce δ -rays of about a ≈1 keV or less that can impart MGy doses to 10-nm-size volumes of DNA. These events can produce severe dual double-strand breaks (DDSB) at the periphery of nucleosomes in single events particularly in heterochromatic DNA. These DDSBs are the most common multiply damaged sites, and their probabilities generally determine the biological effectiveness and therapeutic responses. The recent understanding that most normal tissues with intact TP53 genes generally are low-dose hypersensitive (LDHS) and low-dose apoptotic (LDA) implies that the well-known universal clinical fractionation window at ≈2 Gy/Fr defines the optimal tolerance level of most organs at risk and not the optimal tumor dose per fraction at least when using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Interestingly, practically all cancer cells are linked to genomic instability in some DNA repair, cell cycle, or growth control genes like TP53 that is affected in more than 50% of all tumors. Unfortunately, this often gives tumor cells a low-dose radiation-resistant (LDRR) phenotype. The fractionation window is due to the low-dose and linear energy transfer (

Indexed as

dual nucleosomal double-strand breakslight ion radiation therapylow-dose apoptosislow-dose hyper-sensitivitymultiply damaged sitesoptimal daily-weekly fractionationtherapy optimizationTP53 damage sensors and modification sites

Identifiers

PMID41846870
PMCPMC12990215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.