ArticleThe British journal of cardiology2024
Long-term blood pressure variability: an emerging cardiovascular risk factor.
Article in The British journal of cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Aerobic training conducted at different times of day in elderly patients with hypertension: a controlled trial.GeroScience · 2026Trial
- Systolic Blood Pressure Variability in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Predictor of Infarct Growth and Hemorrhagic Transformation.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Blood pressure variability: a review.Journal of hypertension · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical trials and observational studies have demonstrated that long-term systolic blood pressure variability derived from repeated measurements of visit-to-visit clinic blood pressure is an important predictor of cardiovascular outcomes, independent of average levels of systolic pressure. Even in patients with well-controlled blood pressure (<140/90 mmHg), high systolic blood pressure variability confers an increased risk of cardiovascular events. Systolic blood pressure variability is currently derived from several measurements of visit-to-visit clinic blood pressure and expressed as the standard deviation of systolic pressure. Values in excess of 12 are indicative of high systolic blood pressure variability. Ongoing studies aim to determine whether home blood pressure monitoring may be an alternative way of measuring blood pressure variability. Evidence from several clinical trials shows that long-acting calcium-channel blockers, such as amlodipine, and thiazide-like diuretics are the only antihypertensive drugs that reduce longterm systolic blood pressure variability, and should be used preferentially in patients with high variability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.