ArticleThe British journal of cardiology2024
Subclavian venoplasty for device implantation in a district general hospital: a case series.
Article in The British journal of cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Subclavian chronic total occlusion angioplasty facilitates cardiac implantable electronic device upgrades: A single-center case series.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Subclavian venoplasty is commonly performed for subclavian vein stenosis in patients with long-term dialysis lines or fistulae. Such stenosis may also occur in patients with previously implanted intra-cardiac devices. It poses a problem if a further device upgrade or implantation is planned as the stenosis restricts the advancement of leads. Venoplasty before device implantation may provide a feasible alternative to lead tunnelling or extraction, which have their limitations. Four cases of varying complexities and devices that were implanted in patients with subclavian stenosis are presented herein. These were done in a district general hospital within the cardiology team. Venoplasty was performed using peripheral angioplasty balloons after which the device was implanted. All cases were performed successfully without any immediate complications with the patients discharged home the same day. These cases show the utility of subclavian venoplasty in facilitating device implantation without the need to utilise contralateral venous access, hence preserving venous access for the future. Additionally, they illustrate that this may be performed locally in a district general hospital setting, where appropriate expertise is available, with a high success rate and without the need to refer patients to an alternate tertiary care institute which may be associated with additional difficulties for the patient. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first instance where several cases of this procedure were performed successfully in a secondary care setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.