ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025
Comparison of Aligners and Braces in Angle's Class III Malocclusion Cases: A Clinical Study.
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Angle's Class III malocclusion, characterized by mandibular prognathism and anterior crossbite, presents significant functional and esthetic concerns. Traditionally, fixed braces have been the standard treatment, while clear aligners offer an esthetic and comfortable alternative. The effectiveness of these two modalities in Class III correction remains debated. Objective: This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes, treatment efficiency, patient compliance, and post-treatment stability of clear aligners versus fixed braces in Angle's Class III malocclusion cases. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 50 patients with mild to moderate Class III malocclusion, divided into two groups: aligners ( Results: Aligners showed shorter treatment duration (18 ± 3 months vs 22 ± 4 months, Conclusion: Clear aligners are effective for dental correction in mild to moderate Class III cases, with better compliance and shorter treatment times. However, fixed braces remain superior in skeletal modifications, making them the preferred choice for more severe cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.