ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025
Assess the Role of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Improvement of Pain and Quality of Life in Patients with Chronic Low Backache.
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Most frequent concerns among patients who attend orthopaedic centres is chronic low back pain. Material and Methods: Study aimed to compare effectiveness of psychological counselling in addition to standard medical care for patients with chronic low back pain by measuring their improvement with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Comparing Groups A and B at 6 and 12 weeks on the VAS measure. Results: Group A demonstrated 25% and 29% improvement, while for Group B, it was 18% and 20% respectively. At 6 and 12 weeks, the SF-36 measure revealed 13% and 17% improvement in Group A, compared to 5% and 10% in Group B, respectively. At 6 and 12 weeks, the ODI indicated 12% and 18% improvement in Group A versus 9% and 13% in Group B, respectively. Additionally, Group A significantly outperformed Group B in terms of the HADS. Conclusion: We concluded psychological counselling in addition to the regular standard of care produces superior outcomes compared to regular standard of care alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.