Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41846795›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025

Evaluation of Outcomes of Different Incisions Used for the Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars: A Comparative Study.

Pramod D S Raghavendra, Dharani Chowdary Kilari, Kahamnuk Jamatia, Alok Dubey, Sanghamitra Jena, V Arun Deepak, Vedatrayi Tutha

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pramod D S RaghavendraRegistrar Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Riyadh Health Cluster Ministry of Health, Saudi Arabia.
Dharani Chowdary KilariDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, C. K. S. Theja Dental College, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Kahamnuk JamatiaDepartment of Dentistry, AGMC and GBP Hospital, Agartala, Tripura, India.
Alok DubeyDepartment of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Sanghamitra JenaDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Kalinga Institute of Dental Sciences (KIDS), Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology (KIIT) Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
V Arun DeepakDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, RVS Dental College and Hospital, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Vedatrayi TuthaConsultant Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The surgical extraction of impacted mandibular 3 Objective: This research evaluates the outcomes of different incision types in terms of postoperative complications, healing, and patient satisfaction. Materials and Methods: A comparative research was conducted involving 120 patients undergoing impacted mandibular 3 Results: The triangular flap showed faster healing and fewer complications, while the envelope flap resulted in less immediate postoperative pain. Modified triangular flaps demonstrated a balance between outcomes. Conclusion: Selecting an incision should be tailored to patient-specific needs and surgeon expertise, considering the nuances of each technique.

Indexed as

Impacted teethincision techniquesmandibular 3rd molarsoral surgerypostoperative outcomes

Identifiers

PMID41846795
PMCPMC12991670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.