ReviewJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025
Comparative Analysis of Laser-Activated and Ultrasonic Irrigation on Postoperative Pain in Root Canal Therapy: A Systematic Review.
Review in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To compare the efficacy of laser-activated irrigation (LAI) and ultrasonic irrigation (UI) in reducing postoperative pain during root canal therapy (RCT). A systematic review was conducted using eight randomized controlled trials published between 2010 and 2025. Studies included evaluated LAI and UI techniques, focusing on postoperative pain reduction, pain intensity measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and analgesic intake. Comparisons with conventional needle irrigation (CNI) were also included. Statistical analyses of pain scores and analgesic consumption were reviewed. Both LAI and UI demonstrated significant reductions in postoperative pain compared to CNI. LAI was more effective in reducing pain in the first 6-12 h postoperatively, attributed to its superior irrigant penetration and photoacoustic streaming capabilities. UI also showed significant pain reduction, particularly in terms of debris removal and biofilm disruption, with pain scores converging with LAI by 24-48 h. Analgesic intake was lower in LAI patients during the immediate postoperative period. No adverse effects were reported with either technique. LAI and UI are effective irrigation activation techniques for minimizing postoperative pain in RCT, with LAI providing faster initial pain relief. These advanced techniques enhance patient outcomes and offer superior clinical efficacy compared to conventional methods. Further research is recommended to optimize their clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.