Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41846794›Full record

ReviewJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025

Comparative Analysis of Laser-Activated and Ultrasonic Irrigation on Postoperative Pain in Root Canal Therapy: A Systematic Review.

Aditi Kanitkar, Kapil Ramesh Jadhav, Anandamoy Bagchi, Anil Kumar Pulidindi, Tony Mathew, Praveen Kumar Varma Datla

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aditi KanitkarMDS, Ph.D, Assistant Professor, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed to be University, Dental College and Hospital, Sangli, Maharashtra, India.
Kapil Ramesh JadhavAssistant Professor, Director, Specialty Care Unit of Endodontics, A.T. Still University, Missouri School of Dentistry and Oral Health, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Anandamoy BagchiDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Kalinga Institute of Dental Sciences, KIIT (DU), Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Anil Kumar PulidindiDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Tony MathewDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, A B Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, Nitte Deemed to be University, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.
Praveen Kumar Varma DatlaDepartment of Orthodontics, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To compare the efficacy of laser-activated irrigation (LAI) and ultrasonic irrigation (UI) in reducing postoperative pain during root canal therapy (RCT). A systematic review was conducted using eight randomized controlled trials published between 2010 and 2025. Studies included evaluated LAI and UI techniques, focusing on postoperative pain reduction, pain intensity measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and analgesic intake. Comparisons with conventional needle irrigation (CNI) were also included. Statistical analyses of pain scores and analgesic consumption were reviewed. Both LAI and UI demonstrated significant reductions in postoperative pain compared to CNI. LAI was more effective in reducing pain in the first 6-12 h postoperatively, attributed to its superior irrigant penetration and photoacoustic streaming capabilities. UI also showed significant pain reduction, particularly in terms of debris removal and biofilm disruption, with pain scores converging with LAI by 24-48 h. Analgesic intake was lower in LAI patients during the immediate postoperative period. No adverse effects were reported with either technique. LAI and UI are effective irrigation activation techniques for minimizing postoperative pain in RCT, with LAI providing faster initial pain relief. These advanced techniques enhance patient outcomes and offer superior clinical efficacy compared to conventional methods. Further research is recommended to optimize their clinical application.

Indexed as

Irrigation techniqueslaser-activated irrigationpostoperative painroot canal therapyultrasonic irrigation

Identifiers

PMID41846794
PMCPMC12991474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.