ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025
Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy of Different Radiographic Techniques in Diagnosing Periapical Lesions: A Clinical Study.
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reference Standards in Artificial Intelligence Detection of Apical Periodontitis: A Narrative Review of What Reported Accuracy Measures.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study compares the diagnostic accuracy of three radiographic techniques-periapical radiography (PA), panoramic radiography (PAN), and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-in detecting periapical lesions. Methods: A clinical study was conducted involving 60 patients with suspected periapical lesions. Each patient underwent PA, PAN, and CBCT imaging, and the findings were independently assessed by three experienced radiologists. Diagnostic accuracy was determined by correlating imaging results with surgical findings or histopathology reports. Results: CBCT demonstrated the highest diagnostic accuracy (95%) compared to PA (80%) and PAN (72%). The superior accuracy of CBCT was attributed to its ability to detect small lesions and provide three-dimensional views. PA was effective in detecting moderate-sized lesions but lacked depth information, while PAN was limited by overlapping structures. Conclusion: CBCT outperformed traditional radiographic techniques in diagnosing periapical lesions, particularly for small or complex cases. These findings emphasize the importance of selecting appropriate imaging modalities for accurate diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.