ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025
Evaluation of Different Temporomandibular Joint Therapies for Internal Derangement Cases: A Comparative Study.
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Internal derangement of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is a significant contributor to orofacial pain and functional impairment. Effective treatment strategies are crucial to improving patient outcomes. Materials and Methods: A prospective comparative study involving 90 patients with confirmed TMJ internal derangement was conducted over 18 months. Patients were randomly divided into three groups, each receiving one of the therapies. Outcome measures included pain intensity, jaw function, and patient satisfaction, assessed at baseline, 6 weeks, and 3 months post-treatment. Results: All three therapies demonstrated improvements, with surgical interventions showing the highest pain reduction and jaw function improvement scores. Conservative management was effective in mild cases but less impactful for severe derangements. Minimally invasive therapies provided moderate relief, particularly for moderate cases. Conclusion: Tailored treatment approaches based on severity and patient-specific factors are essential for managing TMJ internal derangement effectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.