ReviewJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025
Blood Substitutes Used in Dentistry and OMFS: Systematic Review.
Review in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Perioperative blood loss during dental and oral and maxillofacial surgical (OMFS) procedures often necessitates red blood cell (RBC) transfusion. However, associated risks, cost, and supply limitations have prompted the exploration of alternatives and evidence-based transfusion strategies. A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science using PRISMA guidelines. Studies were included if they focused on RBC transfusion or alternatives in surgical settings with relevance to OMFS. Data were extracted on study design, findings, and applicability to dental surgery. Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria. These included guidelines, reviews, randomized trials, and observational studies. Key findings emphasized the benefits of restrictive transfusion thresholds, preoperative anemia management, intraoperative cell salvage, and adjunct therapies like erythropoietin and antifibrinolytics. Complications, such as transfusion-related acute lung injury, immunomodulation, and procedural errors, were highlighted. Only one study directly addressed OMFS, though others offered applicable insights. Emerging practices in transfusion medicine can enhance safety and efficacy in OMFS. Adoption of patient blood management strategies and transfusion alternatives should be prioritized in dental surgical planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.