ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025
Assessment of Outcomes in Patients who Underwent Traditional and Advanced Orthodontic Treatment: A Comparative Study.
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study compares the outcomes of traditional orthodontic treatments (fixed appliances) with advanced orthodontic techniques (clear aligners) in terms of efficacy, patient satisfaction, and treatment duration. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 200 patients divided into two groups: traditional (Group A) and advanced (Group B) treatments. Data collection included clinical outcomes, patient-reported satisfaction surveys, and treatment timelines. Statistical analysis was performed using the Chi-square test and independent Results: Advanced orthodontic treatments showed a shorter mean treatment duration (18.2 months vs. 24.6 months, Conclusion: Advanced orthodontic techniques provide faster treatment and higher patient satisfaction, with outcomes similar to traditional methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.