Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41846737›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025

Evaluation of Success Rates of Conventional and Single-Piece Implant Systems: A Prospective Study.

Sameer Chauhan, Pooja Palwankar, Shilpa Sunil Khanna, Anita Mohanty, Komal Thakkar, Harisha Dewan, M C Prashant, Rahul Tiwari

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sameer ChauhanDepartment of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, K. M. Shah Dental College and Hospital, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.
Pooja PalwankarDepartment of Periodontology, Manav Rachna Dental College, SDS, MRIIRS, Faridabad, Haryana, India.
Shilpa Sunil KhannaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Sri Ramakrishna Dental College and Hospital, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Anita MohantyDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Kalinga Institute of Dental Science, KIIT Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Komal ThakkarDepartment of Periodontology, Pacific Dental College and Research Centre, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Harisha DewanDepartment of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
M C PrashantDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, RKDF Dental College and Research Centre Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Rahul TiwariDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, RKDF Dental College and Research Centre, Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan University, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Dental implants have revolutionized oral rehabilitation, offering durable and functional solutions for tooth replacement. Conventional and single-piece implant systems differ in design and surgical protocol, which may impact clinical outcomes. Aim: This prospective study evaluates and compares the success rates of conventional and single-piece implants over a 12-month period. Materials and Methods: Fifty patients were randomly divided into two groups: conventional implants (Group A) and single-piece implants (Group B). Outcomes measured included implant survival, marginal bone loss, and patient satisfaction. Results: Both systems exhibited high survival rates (96% for conventional and 92% for single-piece implants). Marginal bone loss was slightly higher in single-piece implants, while patient satisfaction was higher during the initial healing phase. Conclusion: Both implant systems are effective for dental rehabilitation, with no significant difference in long-term success. The choice should be tailored to individual patient needs.

Indexed as

Conventional implantsdental implantspatient satisfactionsingle-piece implantssuccess rates

Identifiers

PMID41846737
PMCPMC12991456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.