ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025
Efficacy of Diode Lasers in Treatment of Peri-Implantitis: A Prospective Study.
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Peri-implantitis is a significant challenge in implant dentistry, characterized by inflammation and progressive bone loss around dental implants. Traditional nonsurgical treatments have shown limited efficacy. Diode lasers, due to their bactericidal properties and minimal invasiveness, offer a promising alternative. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of diode lasers in managing peri-implantitis, focusing on clinical and radiographic outcomes. Methods: This prospective research involved 30 patients with diagnosed peri-implantitis. Patients were randomly assigned to diode laser therapy or conventional mechanical debridement. Clinical parameters, including "probing depth (PD)," "bleeding on probing (BOP)," and radiographic bone levels, were assessed at baseline, three months, and six months posttreatment. Results: Significant reductions in PD and BOP were observed in the diode laser group compared to the control group at 6 months ( Conclusion: Diode lasers show superior efficacy in managing peri-implantitis compared to mechanical debridement, with enhanced clinical outcomes and minimal adverse effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.