Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41846675›Full record

ArticleERJ open research2026

A phase 1 pharmacokinetics study of deupirfenidone (LYT-100) in healthy older adults.

Toby M Maher, Michael C Chen, Chris C Korth, Eric Elenko, Mark D Harnett, Varun Garg, Camilla S Graham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ERJ open research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Toby M MaherNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7192-9149
Michael C ChenPureTech Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Chris C KorthPureTech Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Eric ElenkoPureTech Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Mark D HarnettHarnett Biostatistics Consulting, Stow, MA, USA.
Varun GargPureTech Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Camilla S GrahamPureTech Health, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Deupirfenidone, a selectively deuterated form of pirfenidone, is being developed for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), where tolerability limits current antifibrotic use. Deupirfenidone retains the biological activity of pirfenidone, and the differentiated pharmacokinetic (PK) profile may be associated with improved tolerability. Methods: A phase 1, three-part, randomised, double-blind study was conducted to identify phase 2 doses. The safety, tolerability, steady-state PK and food effect profile of deupirfenidone were assessed in healthy older adults. Part 1 was a crossover study comparing deupirfenidone 850 mg twice daily to pirfenidone 801 mg three times daily. Part 2 was a crossover study comparing deupirfenidone 550 mg three times daily to pirfenidone 801 mg three times daily. Part 3 was a parallel study of deupirfenidone 550 mg three times daily titrated to deupirfenidone 824 mg three times daily Results: Deupirfenidone 850 mg twice daily met the equivalence criterion to pirfenidone 801 mg three times daily for area-under-the-curve (AUC); however, maximum measured concentration ( Conclusions: Results suggest evaluating a dose for deupirfenidone in healthy older adults of between 550 mg three times daily and 825 mg three times daily. Both doses are being evaluated in a 26-week, phase 2b study in patients with IPF.

Identifiers

PMID41846675
PMCPMC12991009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.