ArticleCureus2026
Isolated Cone Dystrophy With Secondary Macular Involvement Mimicking Vascular Insult and Optic Atrophy: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Isolated cone dystrophy is a rare retinal degenerative disorder characterized by selective dysfunction of cone photoreceptors, with relatively preserved rod function. Clinical presentation can be variable and, in rare cases, may mimic retinal vascular injuries or optic neuropathies, leading to diagnostic uncertainty. We report the case of a 32-year-old male patient with gradual, painless, asymmetric vision loss predominantly affecting the left eye. Fundus examination revealed optic disc pallor, arteriolar narrowing, macular pigmentary changes, and absence of the foveal reflex, raising initial concerns for retinal vascular insufficiency or optic atrophy. Multimodal imaging showed widespread macular thinning, photoreceptor layer disruption, and an enlarged foveal avascular zone, complicating the diagnostic evaluation. Full-field electroretinography demonstrated preserved scotopic responses but markedly reduced photopic responses, confirming selective cone dysfunction and establishing a diagnosis of isolated cone dystrophy with secondary macular involvement. The absence of systemic vascular risk factors, a routine neurological examination, and characteristic electrophysiological findings were pivotal in differentiating this condition from vascular or optic nerve disorders. This case highlights the importance of considering cone dystrophy in the differential diagnosis of painless, progressive vision loss with optic disc pallor and macular changes. It underscores the critical role of electrophysiology and multimodal imaging in accurate diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.