ArticleCureus2026
Self-Reported Treatment for Hearing Loss in Adults Living With or Without Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV).
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and its treatment have been associated with hearing loss. For those who can benefit from treatment for hearing loss (i.e., hearing aids), uptake for services is low, likely due to stigma. There is also stigma for people living with HIV (PWH). As such, it is not known how both hearing loss and HIV status affect whether or not adults seek treatment for hearing loss. Therefore, the purpose of this cross-sectional (PT1) study was to evaluate self-reported hearing ability and hearing loss treatment in middle-aged and aged PWH and people without HIV (PWOH). Participants in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study (MACS) Women's Interagency HIV Study (WIHS) Clinical Cohort Study (MWCCS) were asked questions related to their hearing ability and whether they sought hearing services. Among the 933 participants who reported hearing problems, 143 (15.3%) reported using hearing amplification; there was no difference by HIV serostatus. Almost 50% of participants who reported having a lot of trouble hearing did not report using any hearing amplification. Increased public education about hearing loss and amplification is needed, and this should come from audiologists and primary care physicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.